IM:
Gentlemen, I had an interesting dream last night. It involved a report by newly appointed special
counsel Robert Mueller to the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein. It summarized findings stemming from his
investigation. With Rosenstein’s
permission the report was allowed to be made public at a national press
conference on Friday, June 15, 2018 at 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.
AM:
I suspect, as Democrats have been pining for, Mueller's report sought prosecution of
President Trump and some of his lieutenants.
After all, when Mueller was the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), he actually reported to Comey when Comey was the Deputy
Attorney General. News
reports indicate they had a cozy relationship. In the left’s opinion, prosecution
would be suitable retribution for colluding with the Russians to steal the
election.
Old Gadfly: IM, before we hear about your dream, let me
remind you that there is a reason we have heard members of the left refer to
the current developments as “Nixonian” or “shades of Watergate.” There have been deliberate actions by
Democrats that parallel efforts to take down Nixon. The media amplified the effect then as now. On
the 10th of May, this was a New
York Times headline: “In
Trump Firing of James Comey, Echoes of Watergate.” Today’s Democrats essentially held Rod Rosenstein
hostage to the idea of a special counsel in order to secure confirmation. Similar actions took place when Democrats
held hostage Elliott Richardson and William Ruckelshaus for attorney general
and deputy attorney general, respectively.
This took place during Senate confirmation hearings as Watergate was
unfolding. Although this may sound like
a strange connection, Richardson’s so called “independent prosecutor,”
Archibald Cox, was cozy with Democrats, actually inviting Senators Ted Kennedy
and the widow of Robert Kennedy to his swearing in ceremony.[1] One would think that Cox would take the
necessary precautions to avoid appearing partisan.
As I explained in a previous
discussion, in the 1950s U.S. Congressman Richard Nixon was the lead
investigator that led to the conviction of Alger Hiss, a Communist agent for
the Soviet GRU but a close friend of highly placed Democrats. According to Philip Elman, in 1943, he, Alger
Hiss, and Archibald Cox worked together under Dean Acheson at the State
Department.[2] Do you get the drift?
Unfortunately, a lot of what
we know about Watergate is folklore.
More recent historians secured access to recently released original
documents that indicate Nixon
was innocent of any crimes yet unjustly convicted based on fabrications and
manipulation of the public narrative. In
other words, Nixon was tried and convicted in the public court, orchestrated by
power centers on the left: Democrats
(elected and in judicial roles) and the media.
In the process, laws were broken in terms of conspiracy and collusion by
prosecutors and judges.[3] And the media loves leaks now as they did
then. Tell me again. How are The
New York Times and The Washington
Post different from Wikileaks?
AM:
They are worse—they betray the essence of freedom of the press in
America. However, there is some irony and an abundance of truth in Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s observation
that American newspapers are like the Communist newspapers of the former Soviet
Union. So Trump is screwed!! Déjà vu all over again!!
IM:
Take a breath guys. Let me tell
you my dream. You are going to find this
hard to believe. Here goes . . .
Going into the summer of
2018, Democrats were projected to rout Republicans in the mid-term elections—nationally
and at the state level. The media was
already spiking the football as public figures from the left talked about the
final phase of a transformed America.
Finally, one political party was on the verge of completely dominating
political values for America. America
was about to become Soviet America, adopting the Communist
Party USA’s slogan: people and planet
before profit.
Democrats kept
investigations going in the House and Senate, periodically giving press reports
that they were close to completing them, that they were convinced of collusion
between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
Every week there was some bombshell report in The New York Times or Washington
Post based on leaks from anonymous sources within the government. Hillary Clinton began building a campaign
staff for the 2020 elections.
Surprisingly, throughout this time, Mueller provided absolutely no
reports on the investigation.
Miraculously, there were no leaks from his staff.
Then, on Thursday, June 14,
2018, Mueller announced that he would publicly present the results of the
investigation the next day at 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Not known for drama, Mueller requested a coliseum
and maximum coverage on all the networks.
Republicans and Trump supporters were already preparing for the bad
news. Democrats and the media were
already talking about lengthy prison terms and celebrating final retribution
for stealing the election.
The appointed time
arrived. Mueller took the stage and
announced two major findings. First,
there was no evidence of collusion with Russia.
Second, the investigation into any evidence of obstruction of justice
revealed serious violations of the law. Commentators
on MSNBC and CNN wanted to be the first to start listing names of those they
believed were involved: President Trump
when he suggested that “I hope you can let it go,” Lt General Flynn, Jared Kushner,
Steve Bannon, and so forth.
Then, Mueller looked into
the camera and declared the investigation revealed a network of conspirators
with an overwhelming rabbit trail of incriminating evidence. Secret grand juries had already been held, gag
orders were issued to all parties involved.
The thread for this aspect
of the investigation began with Comey.
Mueller wanted to know if the Wikileaks material had any other source
other than Russia. He discovered that
the Washington DC police had been investigating the
death of Seth Rich, an idealistic 27-year old staff member of the
Democratic National Committee (DNC) but had been pressured by Comey to back off
since the FBI was already investigating this issue in light of the broader
Russian collusion investigation. Mueller
discovered that while Russia had in fact hacked into the DNC email system, the
actual material
from Wikileaks actually came from Seth Rich. Rich was found with two bullets to the back. His wallet was intact with cash and credit
cards—clearly the appearance of an assassination. Authentic emails from Podesta previously expressed
the intent to make
an example of a leaker, “whether or not we have any real basis for it.” This communication was more than
circumstantial and far more egregious than President Trump’s “I hope you can
let it go” request of Comey. The Clinton
campaign insisted upon not working with the press, unless they could directly
control the narrative. Yet, when it came
to their attempt to spin the news with the trumped up Russian
dossier on candidate Trump, I became very concerned that the FBI
actually contributed to the narrative by leaking it to the press.
Obviously, we opened the
aperture and justified reopening the Clinton email case. We reversed immunity granted to various
members associated with this case.
Despite an aggressive attempt to destroy evidence—an act that is
obstruction of justice—we gathered sufficient evidence to seek indictments from
a grand jury. Besides Hillary, husband
William, John Podesta, Sidney Blumenthal, and a host of other associates, we
will be pursuing prosecutions and maximum sentences. Commentators on MSNBC and CNN were
visibly shocked. Some began to cry
uncontrollably.
Mueller continued. The thread of our investigation led to other
criminal activity within the Justice Department, the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
the National Security Council (NSC), the National Security Agency (NSA), and the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Although Lois Lerner deserved prosecution for her role in censoring
voices on the right, we granted immunity to get evidence that took us not only
to the political officer appointed to the IRS, but to members of the White
House staff. Valerie Jarrett immediately
sought immunity to provide evidence that proved Barack Obama was involved in
covering up illegal activity in Fast and Furious, the Benghazi attack, prisoner
exchanges with Afghanistan and Iran, and other less known activities. Attorneys General Holder and Lynch also
conspired to support political actions contrary to public law. These were the big fish in the
conspiracy. Since the evidence is
irrefutable, we are pressing forward with these prosecutions as we also continue
to follow the thread throughout the conspiracy, to include leakers within the NSC,
the FBI, the NSA, and the CIA. We are
also considering seditious behavior considerations for journalists who collaborated
in these activities knowing the motive or intent of the leakers was to subvert
the legitimacy of a constitutionally elected President.
Although I did not vote for
President Trump, nor do I even appreciate his agenda or style, as a man of the
law, I had no other moral obligation but to enforce actions in his attempt to
drain the swamp. That completes my presentation;
I will be taking no questions.
AM: Wow.
Your dream is wishful thinking.
Old Gadfly: Cicero observed similar dangers in his own
day. We would be wise to recognize the similarities captured in Cicero's
statement:
A nation can survive its fools, and even the
ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is
less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor
moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through
all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor
appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he
wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep
in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and
unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body
politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
Let us hope that Mueller
understands this caution and helps our nation save its soul.
[1] For a well-documented history on
Archibald Cox and his Watergate connection, see Archibald
Cox. (2017, May 18). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved
22:50, May 18, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archibald_Cox&oldid=780960548
[2] Norman I. Silber, With All Deliberate Speed: The Life of Philip Elman: An Oral History Memoir in Mr. Elman’s Words,
(Ann Arbor, MI: The University of
Michigan Press, 2004), p. 140.
[3] For instance, see Geoff Shepard, The Real Watergate Scandal: Collusion, Conspiracy, and the Plot that
Brought Nixon Down, (Washington, DC:
Regnery History, 2015).
Outstanding article! I especially like the Cicero quote. For years I have been hoping that someone in the Justice Department/FBI would actually culminate an investigation by recommending charges, just as your dream envisioned. I have been sorely disappointed to see one career politician or political appointee after another allowed to "plead the fifth" or "not remember" their egregious conduct, and no further action taken, either by Congress or the Justice Department. Hillary Clinton, "extremely careless" with classified information (to say the least), but no charges. Eric Holder, held in contempt of Congress, but no charges. You've listed the main recent culprits, but you could certainly add Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony "love my Weiner", Susan Rice for "unmasking" innocent American citizens, and especially the Clinton Foundation for quid pro quo foreign "donations" to their personal "get out of poverty" account.
ReplyDeleteDo I think your dream has a chance at reality? In a word--No. I don't necessarily disapprove of Mueller as the choice for Special Counsel, as I believe he is a very honorable man, and can be trusted to at least be truthful in his findings. It's a plus, but I am a bit surprised that so many Democrats are praising his selection. They must be victims of their own mendacity, believing that he will surely find evidence of the Russian collusion that they themselves invented. "Oh! what a tangled web we weave
When first we practise to deceive!" -- Sir Walter Scott. I think Mueller will not find any evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians. He may find some less than brilliant behavior, on the part of certain individuals, such as Lt. Gen. Flynn, but nothing rising to the level of criminal act. Unfortunately, I also don't think he will pursue any criminal charges against anyone else, including those you and I have previously mentioned. Why? For the very reason that should have disqualified him as a special counsel -- his close personal friendship with Comey, which he professed on numerous occasions. I think it will be very difficult for him to now find fault with Comey, and pursue or recommend criminal charges where Comey did not. Is it possible that he could throw Comey under the bus for acting like an unwilling prosecutor (which he was prior to the FBI) instead of an experienced law enforcement officer (which he never was)? Possible, but not likely. I suspect I will be gravely disappointed again. Old Jaeger
Old Jaeger,
ReplyDeleteExcellent points. Welcome aboard. We look forward to expanded conversations.
Old Gadfly
Great article, Chico.
ReplyDeleteWe live in the 6th district in GA and awaiting a June 20th runoff election. Dems are pouring money into John Ossoff. You don't even see any commercial advertisements. Dems are making numerous lies about their candidate and Karen Handel and many don't bother to seek the truth. I hope the Republicans can rally and defeat Ossoff. GOP needs this seat in Congress.
Fot
Thank you, Fot. We need members in Congress with backbones, not progressive agendas.
ReplyDeleteYou won't see this in the mainstream news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkcxeJCPgz0
ReplyDeleteWatch this before deleted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7nC6J8WWcE&t=6s