Old Gadfly: Gentlemen, happy
Memorial Day weekend. Any reflections?
AM: When I think of my father’s experiences as a decorated
and wounded fighter pilot in the Pacific Theater during World War II, my own
experiences in combat and the friends who paid the ultimate price, and all of
our fallen brothers and sisters who gave their lives for America, I can’t help but
believe America is now on its knees.
Old Gadfly: Why do you say this?
AM: I do not recall a period in my lifetime when
the world was in such a fragile state, to include my own country, America. Of course, I was born after WWII, so I only
know about this era from my father and mother, and their peers and history
books (which have evolved in the modern educational system to water down the
major moral issues involved). The
international system was threatened by Japanese imperialism and German
fascism. Millions of lives were
sacrificed in this conflict. Then, I
personally experienced the threat of communism during the Korean War, the Cold
War, and in direct combat operations during the Vietnam War.
Old Gadfly: I had a recent conversation with a
cadet at the United States Air Force Academy in which I asked for his thoughts
about communism. His response was that
he did not know what communism is. I
told him that while it had been 13 years since I retired from the Air Force, my
30 years in uniform were mostly in support of our defense of America against
the threat of communism. This reinforces
your observation about how the educational system has watered down essential
truths about history.
IM: Let me contribute one of my
observations. This past week, the
American President visited Hiroshima in Japan.
Ironically, this visit was days before America celebrated Memorial
Day. In listening to the President’s
speech, I recognized a clear collision between sophomoric anti-American idealism
and the blunt and unforgiving impact of reality. And, the reality of Obama’s rhetoric was to
force America to its knees—a country that gave him the privilege (not due to the
politically correct notion of white privilege, but the privilege of being an
American) of ascending to the position of President. This is
one reason he apparently felt compelled to say one American presidential candidate is making other
world leaders nervous. He fails to
acknowledge that other nations are not used to a world without American
leadership. So, Obama attempted to
assuage international concerns by suggesting America get back on its knees in
apology for past Presidential decisions.
Old Gadfly: He did not apologize for dropping
the atomic bomb.
IM: He did not explicitly apologize. His rhetoric
was more damning:
Seventy-one years ago, on a bright cloudless morning,
death fell from the sky and the world was changed. A flash of light and a wall
of fire destroyed a city and demonstrated that mankind possessed the means to
destroy itself. . . .
The world war that reached its brutal end in Hiroshima
and Nagasaki was fought among the wealthiest and most powerful of nations.
Their civilizations had given the world great cities and magnificent art. Their
thinkers had advanced ideas of justice and harmony and truth. And yet the war
grew out of the same base instinct for domination or conquest that had caused
conflicts among the simplest tribes, an old pattern amplified by new
capabilities and without new constraints.
Old Gadfly: America had no conquest intentions. And, I noticed the President felt no obligation to
instantiate the atomic bombing act within the broader historical context.
Old Gadfly: While serving in a leadership position in
Japan from 1997 to 1999, I had a visit from a small delegation from the
Japanese Defense Forces Military History Directorate. The senior officer was a major general,
accompanied by two colonels. After a
tour of some of the World War II historical sites at Yokota Air Base, we sat
for coffee and a visit. A few minutes into
our seemingly trivial conversation through my interpreter, I decided to share
an observation. It stemmed from a
documentary on WWII seen through the lenses of four national perspectives: America, British, French, and the Soviet
Union. The specific scene I shared was
when the Soviet Union’s Stalin dictated a communique through a Japanese scholar
to the Emperor of Japan, inviting him to join forces with Russia. When the response arrived, Stalin was anxious
to hear what the Emperor had to say. The
scholar, somewhat perplexed, said the response was provided in an ancient form
of Kanji (Chinese characters used in the Japanese language). “Well,” Stalin asked, “can you translate it?” “Yes,” the scholar said, “but it is a non-answer.” “What does that mean?” Stalin thundered. The scholar explained that the emperor had no
authority to make any agreements because the military was in political command. When I noticed that there was no discernible
reaction from the general, I asked my interpreter if she had relayed my
thoughts verbatim. She admitted that she
had modified the message somewhat. I
asked her to please repeat what I said verbatim. This time the general visibly reacted, and
said, “It is refreshing to discuss history frankly and truthfully—we cannot
learn from our mistakes if we do not embrace them.”
IM: So, Obama’s idealism failed to understand the
importance of historical lessons learned and how civilizations truly advance.
Old Gadfly: That’s correct. Fortunately, America still includes among its
citizens those who have a firmer grasp on reality. Here
is an excellent article by my good friend, Dr. John Powers, on the Japanese
atomic bomb decision.
AM: Dr. Powers’ logic and analysis are solid.
Old Gadfly: Yes, and
amazingly, supposed smart people still want to rewrite history. A couple weeks after I hosted the Japanese
major general, I hosted a visit by a group of officers and senior government
civilians (similar to America’s National War
College). At my table were 10
Japanese colonels and Japan’s Chief Scientist.
Interrupting a pleasant conversation about current affairs between
America and Japan, the Chief Scientist, a woman, asked me for my opinion about
the morality of the Potsdam
Declaration. I responded that it was
a very serious dilemma—a choice between two evils. It took tremendous moral courage to make the
right decision. A different decision
most likely would not have enabled the Japanese culture to allow a woman to be
Japan’s Chief Scientist. The men at the
table clearly understood the message.
The Chief Scientist seemed unwilling to change her notion of the history
she wanted to believe.
IM: Yet,
for the President of the United States, a country that has gone to great
lengths to defeat tyranny and to promote liberty in America and beyond, to
subtly criticize monumental moral decisions by former Presidents who
demonstrated true character and leadership, clearly illustrates that this
President diminishes what America is about while extolling his own narcissistic
appetite for personal greatness.
Old Gadfly: When I was younger and deployed to Turkey, I
had an interesting experience. While
walking down a dirt road near Incirlik Air Base in civilian clothes, a little
boy looked at me and saluted. I returned
his salute. I asked a nearby older man,
who was observing, if he spoke English.
And he said, “Yes.” I asked him
why the little boy saluted me. He said, “Because
you are American.” I asked, “How does he
know I’m American?” He responded, “You
have the walk of freedom.”
AM: We are losing that image. Just this week, I read that the Air Force is
considering annual bonuses of nearly $60,000 to keep pilots from transitioning
to the airlines. What happened to a
sense of duty?
IM: Well, doesn’t a sense of duty require a
belief in serving a greater good?
AM: Yes.
IM: In the Obama era, a time that represented fundamentally
transforming America, what is America?
AM: When I served, it was to protect our
unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Gadfly, remember the Metaphysics of Pure Reason in our philosophy course with Mal Wakin?
Most of us USAF Academy products agreed
with Kant that happiness was a consequence of an unconditional obligation to do
our moral duty. Where is that same sense
of duty today?
Old Gadfly: Obama and his progressive cohort have
deliberately put America on its knees in deference to a Marxist utopia. They do not believe in natural law; they
believe all rights are granted by a government.
This is why America needs to be on its knees, asking for
the same strength and wisdom our founding fathers prayed for when they
created the most prosperous and decent nation in human history. George Washington’s Farewell Address and
Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address represent two Presidents of true moral character,
who understood what America is as an idea and the cost to preserve it. Memorial Day should be a time to perpetuate
this understanding. How many Americans
will interrupt the barbecues to acknowledge the Americans who gave “their last full measure of devotion,” a moral duty to protect and preserve an American idea once
well understood by Americans and the rest of the world? Can this be one of the reasons Trump’s “Let’s
Make America Great Again” slogan resonates with so many Americans? We are a nation once recognized for its
“walk of freedom,” not as a nation on its knees.
